Purpose
Work through the advocacy activities you are considering and prioritize them with the priority score method described in Independent Sector's report Earning Influence: Recommendations to Increase Nonprofit Advocacy and Civic Engagement (2025), Section 5, Appendix E. Scoring each one across three dimensions turns a long wish-list into a ranked, defensible plan you can act on.
The scoring system
Every activity is scored on three factors. Each has a bar that runs from minimum to maximum. Move the bar to where the activity sits and the tool does the math:
How much it advances the mission and clears a barrier to advocacy
How much effort it takes to develop and launch
How much organizational capacity it requires
| Factor | What it measures | Scale |
|---|---|---|
| Impact | How much it advances the mission and clears a barrier to advocacy | Least value โ Most value |
| Effort | How much effort it takes to develop and launch | Minimal โ Significant |
| Capacity | How much organizational capacity it requires | Minimal โ Substantial |
Priority levels
- 13โ15: Very high priority. High value, low effort and capacity needs.
- 11โ12: High priority. Good value with reasonable requirements.
- 9โ10: Medium priority. Moderate value and / or requirements.
- 7โ8: Lower priority. Limited value or sizeable requirements.
- 3โ6: Low priority. Minimal value or substantial requirements.
Step by step
- Add your organization and name (optional) so exports are labelled.
- Name the activity specifically. For example, "Coalition with local education nonprofits," not just "Coalition." Not sure what to score? Use "Browse activities" under the name field to pick from a library of common activities.
- Set the Impact bar: mission fit, barriers cleared, likely impact on outcomes. Further right means more impact.
- Set the Effort bar: development time, resources to start, planning complexity. Further right means more effort.
- Set the Capacity bar: staff expertise, ongoing resources, fit with current workload. Further right means more capacity needed.
- Save the activity to add it to your ranked shortlist.
- Repeat for every option you are weighing.
- Read the ranked list. The longest, top bar is your strongest option, then decide.
Not sure which activities to score?
Under the activity name, "Browse activities" opens a library drawn from the Earning Influence report and Bolder Advocacy guidance from Alliance for Justice, with a source on every entry. Pick one to start, and a note explains what it is and what it typically involves. As you type your own activity, the tool suggests matching entries from the same library. Under each bar, "What to consider" gives questions to help you judge the activity for your organization. The tool never fills in scores for you: every organization is different.
Tips
- Score as a team to get diverse perspectives.
- Be honest about capacity constraints. That is where the score earns its keep.
- Weigh both short-term and long-term advocacy goals.
- Re-score periodically as your context and capacity change.
- Export to share results with board members or funders.
Saving & exporting
Your evaluations are stored in this browser and persist between visits. You can edit or delete any activity, and export the full list as an Excel spreadsheet or a PDF report for board decks, or backups. Clearing your browser data removes saved evaluations, so export a copy if you want to keep one.
Source
This tool applies the priority score method described in Independent Sector, Earning Influence: Recommendations to Increase Nonprofit Advocacy and Civic Engagement (2025), Section 5, Appendix E: Scoring Methodology. As noted in that report, the priority score method is credited to Park, T. (2018), "Priority Score: A Simple Product Prioritisation Technique."
Score an activity
Your shortlist
Save an activity to rank and export it
Best options first
priority scoreHow the score works
Each bar runs from minimum to maximum and is scored 1 to 5. More impact scores higher. For effort and capacity, less is better, so the tool flips those two so that less effort and less capacity needed also score higher, following the report's method. The three add up to a priority score from 3 to 15. Higher means more value for less lift. Re-score as your capacity and context change.